Radcliff v. Division of Motor Vehicles

West Virginia Court of Claims

Radcliff v. Division of Motor Vehicles

21 Ct. Cl. 157

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedFebruary 5, 1997

DocketCC-94-830

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 157 (Radcliff v. Division of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Radcliff v. Division of Motor Vehicles, 21 Ct. Cl. 157 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court upon a stipulation agreed to by the claimant and the respondent. The stipulation establishes the following facts:

1. Claimant prepared and submitted a proposed contract for the position of Coordinator of the Motorcycle Safety Program to respondent during the month of May 1994.

2. Claimant incurred various expenses in good faith, believing that he would be appointed to the position of Coordinator of the Motorcycle Safety Program. These expenses totaled $7,112.35.

3. Claimant and respondent agreed to settle and compromise this claim for the amount of $3,500.00.

The Court, having reviewed the facts of this claim and having determined that the agreed upon amount of $3,500.00 is both fair and reasonable, is of the opinion that an award should be made to the claimant in accordance with the stipulation. Therefore, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $3,500.00.

Award of $3,500.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI