Radak v. Radak

56 A.D.2d 770, 392 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11036

This text of 56 A.D.2d 770 (Radak v. Radak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radak v. Radak, 56 A.D.2d 770, 392 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

[771]*771Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 28, 1976, denying plaintiffs motion seeking an order to direct the defendant to appear for an examination before trial but granting production of certain financial records, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs and disbursements, to direct that the defendant appear for examination before trial in Special Term, Part 2, at 9:30 a.m., within 20 days after entry of an order hereon, or as the parties may otherwise agree, with the defendant to bring all relevant records to the examination with leave to him to raise appropriate objections in Special Term as may be required and the order is otherwise affirmed. That temporary alimony was denied is not relevant to a determination of permanent alimony (Hearst v Hearst, 3 AD2d 706, affd 3 NY2d 967) and, since the plaintiff seeks permanent alimony, complete financial disclosure is required by section 250 of the Domestic Relations Law without the need of showing special circumstance. That the plaintiff may have some knowledge of the defendant’s finances does not foreclose her right to have the defendant state his own knowledge under oath. Concur— Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Capozzoli, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst v. Hearst
146 N.E.2d 792 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
Hearst v. Hearst
3 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 770, 392 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radak-v-radak-nyappdiv-1977.