Raczy v. County of Westchester

95 A.D.2d 859, 464 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18809
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 27, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 95 A.D.2d 859 (Raczy v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raczy v. County of Westchester, 95 A.D.2d 859, 464 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered September 23,1982, which granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and application denied. On July 20, 1981 claimant Patricia Raczy was injured when she slipped and fell in the locker room of the Sprain Ridge Park Pool. She thereafter experienced back and leg pains, and she eventually underwent surgery for removal of a herniated disc in December, 1981. She retained counsel in March, 1982, and the instant proceeding was initiated in June, 1982. Although Raczy now alleges that her fall was caused by the accumulation of an excessive amount of water in the locker room which caused slick and slippery conditions, an accident report completed on the day of the accident as the result of a telephone call from Raczy listed the description and cause of the accident as “her son slipped off bench — she went to grab him & fell against corner of bench hitting thigh”. This description did not provide the appellants with actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim. In light of the inadequate description of the cause of the accident, Raczy’s inability to adequately identify the persons to whom she allegedly provided the correct information on the day of the accident, and the unexplained lengthy delay in retaining counsel and initiating the instant proceeding, it was an abuse of discretion to grant the application (see Matter of Morris v County of Suffolk, 88 AD2d 956; Goodson v New York City Tr. Auth., 66 AD2d 675). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. New York City Housing Authority
81 A.D.3d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Kirtley v. Albany County Airport Authority
67 A.D.3d 1317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Moore v. New York City Transit Authority
189 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Hurley v. Avon Central School District
187 A.D.2d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Pavone v. City of New York
170 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
D'Andrea v. City of Glen Cove Public Schools
143 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Mallory v. City of New York
135 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Perry v. City of New York
133 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Morgan v. City of Elmira
115 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Levine v. City of New York
111 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Caselli v. City of New York
105 A.D.2d 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.2d 859, 464 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raczy-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1983.