Rackley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rackley v. State

207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17769

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 2016·No. No. 1D16-2544·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although we find Appellant’s motion under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure was timely filed, we reject Appellant’s claims on the merits and affirm. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906 (Fla.2002) (noting that appellate court may affirm a trial court order that reaches the right result but for the wrong reason).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although we find Appellant’s motion under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure was timely filed, we reject Appellant’s claims on the merits and affirm. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906 (Fla.2002) (noting that appellate court may affirm a trial court order that reaches the right result but for the wrong reason).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ„ concur.

Rackley v. State, 207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17769 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

207 So. 3d 365 (Rackley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related