Rackley v. Slade, Et Vir

193 So. 70, 141 Fla. 310, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 781
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 So. 70 (Rackley v. Slade, Et Vir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rackley v. Slade, Et Vir, 193 So. 70, 141 Fla. 310, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 781 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Rupert L. Rackley as Administrator, etc., v. Louise Mathews, filed at this term of Court, and the decree herein is affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph v. State
447 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 70, 141 Fla. 310, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rackley-v-slade-et-vir-fla-1940.