Rackers v. Wibberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rackers v. Wibberg

525 S.W.3d 125, 2017 WL 3136274, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 739

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 25, 2017·No. WD 79797·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Kathleen Wibberg, individually and as trustee of two family trusts, and her siblings, Dennis Rackers, Kenneth Rackers, and Victor Rackers (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment voiding the two trusts because they resulted from undue influence and placing a constructive trust on the trusts’ assets for the equal benefit of Appellants and two other siblings, Steven Rackers and Susan Komaromi. Appellants contend the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s finding of undue influence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided [126] to the parties, we affirm the judgment and deny the requests for attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Kathleen Wibberg, individually and as trustee of two family trusts, and her siblings, Dennis Rackers, Kenneth Rackers, and Victor Rackers (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment voiding the two trusts because they resulted from undue influence and placing a constructive trust on the trusts’ assets for the equal benefit of Appellants and two other siblings, Steven Rackers and Susan Komaromi. Appellants contend the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s finding of undue influence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided [126] to the parties, we affirm the judgment and deny the requests for attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Rackers v. Wibberg, 525 S.W.3d 125, 2017 WL 3136274, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 739 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

525 S.W.3d 125 (Rackers v. Wibberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.