Rackers v. Wibberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rackers v. Wibberg

525 S.W.3d 125, 2017 WL 3136274, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 739

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 25, 2017

DocketWD 79797

StatusPublished

This text of 525 S.W.3d 125 (Rackers v. Wibberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rackers v. Wibberg, 525 S.W.3d 125, 2017 WL 3136274, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 739 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Kathleen Wibberg, individually and as trustee of two family trusts, and her siblings, Dennis Rackers, Kenneth Rackers, and Victor Rackers (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment voiding the two trusts because they resulted from undue influence and placing a constructive trust on the trusts’ assets for the equal benefit of Appellants and two other siblings, Steven Rackers and Susan Komaromi. Appellants contend the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s finding of undue influence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided [126]*126to the parties, we affirm the judgment and deny the requests for attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Kathleen Wibberg, individually and as trustee of two family trusts, and her siblings, Dennis Rackers, Kenneth Rackers, and Victor Rackers (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment voiding the two trusts because they resulted from undue influence and placing a constructive trust on the trusts’ assets for the equal benefit of Appellants and two other siblings, Steven Rackers and Susan Komaromi. Appellants contend the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s finding of undue influence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided [126]*126to the parties, we affirm the judgment and deny the requests for attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 S.W.3d 125, 2017 WL 3136274, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rackers-v-wibberg-moctapp-2017.