Racine v. State
249 So. 2d 648, 47 Ala. App. 33, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Racine v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 Ala. App. 484 →
Opinion
Selling marijuana: sentence, five years.
The true bill omits the name of the buyer. Appellant in writing requested the affirmative charge with hypothesis as to Count One of the indictment. Hence, the trial court erred in refusing this requested charge. Duin v. State, 3 Div. 79, 47 Ala.App. 693, 260 So.2d 599 (Mar. 16, 1971).
In view of reversible error thus being shown, we have not examined any of the other points raised by appellant.
The judgment below is due to be reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Racine v. State, 249 So. 2d 648, 47 Ala. App. 33, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 459 (Ala. Ct. App. 1971).
249 So. 2d 648 (Racine v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duin v. State
260 So. 2d 599 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1971)