Racine Auto Tire Co. v. Hansen
This text of 180 N.W. 124 (Racine Auto Tire Co. v. Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Kerwin did not participate in the consideration and decision of this case. The court is equally divided in opinion upon the question in[119]*119volved on this appeal. Mr. Justice Eschweiler, Mr. Justice Rosenberry, and Mr. Justice Jones are of the opinion that the judgment appealed from should be reversed, and Mr. Justice Vinje, Mr. Justice Owen, and the writer are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Under the established rule it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Swenson v. Flint, 123 Wis. 613, 101 N. W. 1135; Hagenah v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. 136 Wis. 300, 116 N. W. 843; Estate of Carter, 167 Wis. 89, 166 N. W. 657.
By the Court — The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 N.W. 124, 173 Wis. 118, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/racine-auto-tire-co-v-hansen-wis-1920.