Rachmaninoff v. Svm Development Corporation
715 N.W.2d 894, 475 Mich. 889
Opinion
Nikolai RACHMANINOFF and Keiko Rachmaninoff, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SVM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Michael T. Zambricki, Christine S. Zambricki, John J. Davey, Mary L. Davey, Ghouse M. Syed, Shazia A. Syed, Asiruddin Ahmad, Jane Ahmad, Marjorie A. Satterlund, Victor M. Kuffler, and Ann E. Kuffler, Defendants-Appellees, and
Richard O. Dye and Norma E. Dye, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rachmaninoff v. Svm Development Corporation, 715 N.W.2d 894, 475 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2006).
715 N.W.2d 894 (Rachmaninoff v. Svm Development Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Calkins
715 N.W.2d 894 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)