Rachlin v. Lomenzo

218 N.E.2d 909, 17 N.Y.2d 926, 272 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1259
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 21, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.E.2d 909 (Rachlin v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rachlin v. Lomenzo, 218 N.E.2d 909, 17 N.Y.2d 926, 272 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1259 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan and Keating. Taking no part: Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Scileppi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 N.E.2d 909, 17 N.Y.2d 926, 272 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rachlin-v-lomenzo-ny-1966.