Rachels v. Pepoon
138 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 183, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 322
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.
For reversal — WHITE, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rachels v. Pepoon, 138 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 183, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1927).
138 A. 922 (Rachels v. Pepoon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Mid-Central Fish Co.
641 S.W.2d 785 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1982)