Rachel v. State

577 S.W.3d 526
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2019·No. No. ED 106679·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Kavin D. Rachel appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rachel v. State, 577 S.W.3d 526 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

577 S.W.3d 526 (Rachel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.