Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal
Opinion
Opinion issued December 1, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00705-CV ——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF N.P.R., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-38502
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Rachel Christine Randal, has filed an amended motion to dismiss
the appeal stating that she “no longer need[s] . . . to appeal” and requesting that the
Court dismiss her appeal. No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no
opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Although appellant did not
include a certificate of conference in her amended motion, more than ten days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5),
10.3(a).
Accordingly, we grant the appellant’s amended motion and dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as
moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hightower, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal (Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.