Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 1, 2020·No. 01-20-00705-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued December 1, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00705-CV ——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF N.P.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-38502

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Rachel Christine Randal, has filed an amended motion to dismiss

the appeal stating that she “no longer need[s] . . . to appeal” and requesting that the

Court dismiss her appeal. No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no

opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Although appellant did not

include a certificate of conference in her amended motion, more than ten days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5),

10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the appellant’s amended motion and dismiss the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hightower, and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal (Rachel Randal v. Sheldon Alexander Randal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.