Rachel J. Kim v. Victoria Rosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2025·No. 4D2024-2326·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RACHEL J. KIM, Appellant,

v.

VICTORIA ROSA, Appellee.

No. 4D2024-2326

[August 20, 2025]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Daniel Kanner, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE24028473.

Rachel J. Kim, Weston, pro se.

David L. Margolesky, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error. The [appellee] correctly point[s] to the lack of a trial transcript or a proper substitute[.]”).

GERBER, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rachel J. Kim v. Victoria Rosa, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Rachel J. Kim v. Victoria Rosa (Rachel J. Kim v. Victoria Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)