Raburn v. Bradshaw

52 S.E. 922, 124 Ga. 552, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 782
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 22, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 S.E. 922 (Raburn v. Bradshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raburn v. Bradshaw, 52 S.E. 922, 124 Ga. 552, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 782 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Eisn, C. J.

1. In the granting of letters of administration, where there is no surviving husband or wife, the next of kin of the intestate at the time of his death, according to the laws declaring relationship and distribution, is entitled to such letters. Civil Code, §3367 (2). In such a case, the law of relationship should not be relied on to the exclusion of that of distribution. Murdock v. Hunt, 68 Ga. 164.

Argued December 1, Decided December 22, 1905. Application for administration — appeal. ' Before Judge Holden. Warren superior court. April 7, 1905. L. D. McGregor, for plaintiff: in error. E. P. Davis, contra.

2. When there is no surviving husband, wife, child, or lineal descendant, the brothers and sisters of the intestate inherit; the half-blood on the paternal side inheriting equally with the whole-blood; and the father, if living, inheriting equally with the brothers and sisters. Civil Code, §3355, par. 5, 6.

3. “If there be several of the next of kin equally near in degree, the person selected in writing by a majority of those interested as distributees of the estate, and who are capable of expressing a choice, shall be appointed” administrator. Civil Code, §3367, par. 3.

4. Accordingly, in a contest for letters of administration between a sister of the whole-blood and a brother of the half-blood, on the paternal side of the intestate, when such sister was selected in writing by another sister of the whole-blood, and such brother of the half-blood was so selected by the father of himself and of the intestate, and also by four sisters of the half-blood on the paternal side of the intestate, all of the distributees so making selections being capable of making a choice, the ordinary did not e'rr in appointing the brother of the half-blood as administrator.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conewr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. First National Bank of Atlanta
42 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Dawson v. Shave
132 S.E. 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 S.E. 922, 124 Ga. 552, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raburn-v-bradshaw-ga-1905.