Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

701 So. 2d 141, 1997 La. LEXIS 2674, 1997 WL 590008
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 19, 1997·No. No. 97-CC-1441·Published

Opinion

In re Government Employees Ins. Co.;— Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 2414; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 416,757.

Granted. The form used for rejection of uninsured motorist coverage in this case satisfies the requirements of Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co., 609 So.2d 195 (La.1992). See Bryk v. Brock, 95-0889 (La.App. 4th Cir. 10/26/95), 663 So.2d 522. Plaintiffs actions indicate that he affirmatively elected to reject such coverage. In light of this clear evidence, plaintiffs subsequent affidavit does not raise a genuine issue of material fact. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and summary judgment is entered in favor of relator, dismissing it from the proceeding with prejudice.

CALOGERO, C.J., dissents. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 701 So. 2d 141, 1997 La. LEXIS 2674, 1997 WL 590008 (La. 1997).

701 So. 2d 141 (Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryk v. Brock
663 So. 2d 522 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co.
609 So. 2d 195 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)