Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

701 So. 2d 141, 1997 La. LEXIS 2674, 1997 WL 590008

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 19, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-1441

StatusPublished

This text of 701 So. 2d 141 (Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raborn v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 701 So. 2d 141, 1997 La. LEXIS 2674, 1997 WL 590008 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Government Employees Ins. Co.;— Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 2414; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 416,757.

Granted. The form used for rejection of uninsured motorist coverage in this case satisfies the requirements of Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co., 609 So.2d 195 (La.1992). See Bryk v. Brock, 95-0889 (La.App. 4th Cir. 10/26/95), 663 So.2d 522. Plaintiffs actions indicate that he affirmatively elected to reject such coverage. In light of this clear evidence, plaintiffs subsequent affidavit does not raise a genuine issue of material fact. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and summary judgment is entered in favor of relator, dismissing it from the proceeding with prejudice.

CALOGERO, C.J., dissents. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Government Employees Ins. Co.;— Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 2414; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 416,757.

Granted. The form used for rejection of uninsured motorist coverage in this case satisfies the requirements of Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co., 609 So.2d 195 (La.1992). See Bryk v. Brock, 95-0889 (La.App. 4th Cir. 10/26/95), 663 So.2d 522. Plaintiffs actions indicate that he affirmatively elected to reject such coverage. In light of this clear evidence, plaintiffs subsequent affidavit does not raise a genuine issue of material fact. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and summary judgment is entered in favor of relator, dismissing it from the proceeding with prejudice.

CALOGERO, C.J., dissents. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 So. 2d 141, 1997 La. LEXIS 2674, 1997 WL 590008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raborn-v-government-employees-insurance-co-la-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack