Rabon v. State

251 S.W. 806, 94 Tex. Crim. 393, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 167
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 1923·No. No. 7755.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Limestone county of manslaughter, under an indictment charging murder, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

There are neither bills of exception nor statement of facts in the record. Appellant filed a motion for new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, which motion was controverted by the prosecution and the evidence pro and con seems to have been heard by the learned trial judge, who thereupon made his order overruling said motion. In the absence of some showing that this action of the court below was erroneous, it will be approved.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rabon v. State, 251 S.W. 806, 94 Tex. Crim. 393, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 167 (Tex. 1923).

251 S.W. 806 (Rabon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stapler v. State
47 S.W.2d 837 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Harcrow v. State
261 S.W. 1046 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)