Rabold v. Rabold

17 P.2d 1119, 141 Or. 701, 1933 Ore. LEXIS 195
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 17 P.2d 1119 (Rabold v. Rabold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rabold v. Rabold, 17 P.2d 1119, 141 Or. 701, 1933 Ore. LEXIS 195 (Or. 1933).

Opinion

KELLY, J.

A careful reading of the record results in the conclusion that the learned trial judge arrived at the proper solution of the questions involved herein. No good purpose can be served by here placing of record an analysis of the evidence. No new question of law is involved.

It is ordered that the decree of the circuit court be and the same is affirmed, and that neither party recover costs or disbursements herein.

Eand, C. J., Belt and Eossman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 P.2d 1119, 141 Or. 701, 1933 Ore. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabold-v-rabold-or-1933.