Rabl Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rabl Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 317

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 23, 1955

DocketNo. 59487; protest 254552-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 317 (Rabl Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabl Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 317 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was received in evidence and the Government recommended that allowances be made accordingly. The memorandum states that there has been full compliance or waiver of compliance with the pertinent regulations and that, had the evidence been presented during the 90-day period when the protest was before the collector, the claim would have been allowed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was received in evidence and the Government recommended that allowances be made accordingly. The memorandum states that there has been full compliance or waiver of compliance with the pertinent regulations and that, had the evidence been presented during the 90-day period when the protest was before the collector, the claim would have been allowed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Cust. Ct. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabl-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.