Rabl Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rabl Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 317

United States Customs Court·Decided November 23, 1955·No. No. 59487; protest 254552-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was received in evidence and the Government recommended that allowances be made accordingly. The memorandum states that there has been full compliance or waiver of compliance with the pertinent regulations and that, had the evidence been presented during the 90-day period when the protest was before the collector, the claim would have been allowed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was received in evidence and the Government recommended that allowances be made accordingly. The memorandum states that there has been full compliance or waiver of compliance with the pertinent regulations and that, had the evidence been presented during the 90-day period when the protest was before the collector, the claim would have been allowed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Rabl Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 317 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 317 (Rabl Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.