Rabinowitz v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rabinowitz v. Rabinowitz

39 A.D.2d 764, 332 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4550

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 764 (Rabinowitz v. Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabinowitz v. Rabinowitz, 39 A.D.2d 764, 332 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4550 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation or for alternative relief, (1) defendant husband appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 4, 1971, as, after a nonjury trial, (a) granted plaintiff’s application to proceed for a judgment of support and maintenance, in lieu of separation, and (b) directed him to pay $100 per week alimony, to provide medical and hospitalization coverage for her and to pay her $3,500 for her counsel fees; and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from the entire judgment. Judgment affirmed, without costs. It is our understanding that the counsel fee awarded is in addition to the sum already paid to plaintiff’s attorney and is to be used for reimbursement of plaintiff. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation or for alternative relief, (1) defendant husband appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 4, 1971, as, after a nonjury trial, (a) granted plaintiff’s application to proceed for a judgment of support and maintenance, in lieu of separation, and (b) directed him to pay $100 per week alimony, to provide medical and hospitalization coverage for her and to pay her $3,500 for her counsel fees; and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from the entire judgment. Judgment affirmed, without costs. It is our understanding that the counsel fee awarded is in addition to the sum already paid to plaintiff’s attorney and is to be used for reimbursement of plaintiff. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 764, 332 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabinowitz-v-rabinowitz-nyappdiv-1972.