Rabinowitz v. Pizer

New York Supreme Court

Rabinowitz v. Pizer

108 N.Y.S. 994

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 19, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 108 N.Y.S. 994 (Rabinowitz v. Pizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabinowitz v. Pizer, 108 N.Y.S. 994 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

FITZGERALD, J.

In Matter of Abraham v. Goldberg, 6 Misc. Rep. 43, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1113, the attention of the learned court seems not to have been directed to the question of public policy, and the demurrer herein must be sustained, for the reason that the agreement attempted to be made was void under well-settled authority. Knauss v. Krueger Brewing Co., 142 N. Y. 70, 36 N. E. 867; Carman v. Beach, 63 N. Y. 97; Robinson v. Clock, 38 App. Div. 67, 55 N. Y. Supp. 976; Auerbach v. Curie, 119 App. Div. 175, 104 N. Y. Supp. 233.

Demurrer sustained, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FITZGERALD, J.

In Matter of Abraham v. Goldberg, 6 Misc. Rep. 43, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1113, the attention of the learned court seems not to have been directed to the question of public policy, and the demurrer herein must be sustained, for the reason that the agreement attempted to be made was void under well-settled authority. Knauss v. Krueger Brewing Co., 142 N. Y. 70, 36 N. E. 867; Carman v. Beach, 63 N. Y. 97; Robinson v. Clock, 38 App. Div. 67, 55 N. Y. Supp. 976; Auerbach v. Curie, 119 App. Div. 175, 104 N. Y. Supp. 233.

Demurrer sustained, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 N.Y.S. 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabinowitz-v-pizer-nysupct-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack