Rabinowitz v. Kenah
This text of 31 Pa. Super. 334 (Rabinowitz v. Kenah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A consideration of this case has led us all to the conclusion that it was correctly decided in the court below for the reasons given in the opinion filed. If, therefore, the rule of our court as to statement of questions involved had been complied with, the judgment would be affirmed. But there was total failure to comply with the rule. And it is declared to be ‘‘ in the highest degree mandatory and admitting no exception.” We could not refuse to enforce it without self-stultification; fortunately no injustice will result from its enforcement.
The appeal is non-prossed, costs to be paid by the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Pa. Super. 334, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabinowitz-v-kenah-pasuperct-1906.