Rabinowitz v. Evergreen Amusement Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rabinowitz v. Evergreen Amusement Corp.

137 Misc. 387

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 137 Misc. 387 (Rabinowitz v. Evergreen Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabinowitz v. Evergreen Amusement Corp., 137 Misc. 387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, having been directed by defendant’s usher to proceed to the balcony, for a seat, and there was a question for the jury to determine whether the construction of the steps created a dangerous condition which imposed upon defendant the duty of safeguarding them.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Bijur and Peters, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, having been directed by defendant’s usher to proceed to the balcony, for a seat, and there was a question for the jury to determine whether the construction of the steps created a dangerous condition which imposed upon defendant the duty of safeguarding them.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Bijur and Peters, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 Misc. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabinowitz-v-evergreen-amusement-corp-nyappterm-1930.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack