Rabinovich v. Womack

57 A.D.3d 866, 868 N.Y.2d 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and are not to be lightly cast aside (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]). “Only where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident, will a party be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation” (Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984] [citation omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 302 [2002]; Moshe v Town of Ramapo, 54 AD3d 1030 [2008]; Shockome v Shockome, 53 AD3d 610 [2008]; Racanelli Constr. Co., Inc. v Tadco Constr. Corp., 50 AD3d 875 [2008]). The appellant failed to establish any legitimate basis to modify the subject stipulation. Fisher, J.P., Florio, Garni and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rabinovich v. Womack, 57 A.D.3d 866, 868 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 866 (Rabinovich v. Womack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wislocki v. Hufnagel
81 A.D.3d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)