Rabinor v. Rabinor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rabinor v. Rabinor

38 A.D.2d 941, 331 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 941 (Rabinor v. Rabinor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabinor v. Rabinor, 38 A.D.2d 941, 331 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered August 4, 1971, which determined the proceeding in petitioner’s favor. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the award of $250 per week for petitioner’s support to $200 per week, as of the time of the entry of said order. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the amount of the award for petitioner’s support was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered August 4, 1971, which determined the proceeding in petitioner’s favor. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the award of $250 per week for petitioner’s support to $200 per week, as of the time of the entry of said order. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the amount of the award for petitioner’s support was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 941, 331 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabinor-v-rabinor-nyappdiv-1972.