Rabich v. City of New York

2024 NY Slip Op 02607
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 2024
DocketIndex No. 159567/16 Appeal No. 2190 Case No. 2022-05326
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 02607 (Rabich v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rabich v. City of New York, 2024 NY Slip Op 02607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Rabich v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 02607)
Rabich v City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 02607
Decided on May 09, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 09, 2024
Before: Webber, J.P., Oing, Rodriguez, Higgitt, Michael, JJ.

Index No. 159567/16 Appeal No. 2190 Case No. 2022-05326

[*1]Linda Rabich etc., Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

The City of New York, Defendant-Appellant, Olson's Creative Landscaping Corp., et al., Defendants.


Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan Paulson of counsel), for appellant.

Sacco Fillas, LLP, Astoria (Dominick Rendina of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie A. Stroth, J.), entered October 14, 2022, which denied defendant City of New York's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Joseph Rabich (decedent) brought this negligence action alleging injuries as a result of a trip and fall due to a broken roadway in the crosswalk at the southbound intersection of Broadway and West 109th Street, in New York County, on or about January 13, 2016.

The City's motion for summary judgment should have been granted. The City met its prima facie burden and established that it did not receive prior written notice of a pothole that caused plaintiff's decedent's accident (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201[c][2]; Yarborough v City of New York, 10 NY3d 726, 728 [2008]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a question of fact that the City affirmatively created the defect through an act of negligence, "that immediately results in the existence of a dangerous condition" (Yarborough, 10 NY3d at 728 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 9, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 03150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 02607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabich-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2024.