Rabe v. Wells & Co.

California Supreme Court

Rabe v. Wells & Co.

3 Cal. 148

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1853

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 148 (Rabe v. Wells & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabe v. Wells & Co., 3 Cal. 148 (Cal. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

[151]*151The question of notice as to the dissolution of the partnership, was properly left to the finding of the jury under the charge of the court.

In the issue presented by the pleadings, it would have been proper to introduce evidence to show that the dissolution was not bona fide, but it does not appear how the evidence which was rejected would have tended to that result.

Error which is relied on must be shown clearly and affirmatively.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

[151]*151The question of notice as to the dissolution of the partnership, was properly left to the finding of the jury under the charge of the court.

In the issue presented by the pleadings, it would have been proper to introduce evidence to show that the dissolution was not bona fide, but it does not appear how the evidence which was rejected would have tended to that result.

Error which is relied on must be shown clearly and affirmatively.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cal. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabe-v-wells-co-cal-1853.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack