Rabe v. State

39 Ark. 204
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 Ark. 204 (Rabe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rabe v. State, 39 Ark. 204 (Ark. 1882).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Rabe was indicted for selling ardent liquors without license. "Waiving a jury, he was tried by the court; was convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $200. No declarations of law were made or refused; and the only question before us is, whether his conviction was sustained by the law and the evidence.

The facts were, that, as a clerk in a village store, he sold brandy-peaches. The bottle contained six peaches, surrounded by one gill of a fluid, or syrup, which tasted like strong liquors. The witnesses thought that this liquid might intoxicate, if one should imbibe enough of it, but it was very weak.

Rabe falls not under the condemnation of the letter of the law, since that requires no license to sell fruits preserved in brandy. Nor does his case come within its spirit, as it would do if he had put a few cherries or peaches in a bottle of brandy to evade payment of the license.

Reversed, and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marks v. State
48 So. 864 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Ark. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabe-v-state-ark-1882.