Rabberman v. Hause

Illinois Supreme Court

Rabberman v. Hause

89 Ill. 209

DecidedJune 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 89 Ill. 209 (Rabberman v. Hause) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabberman v. Hause, 89 Ill. 209 (Ill. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We see no cause to disturb the decree below.

The judgment sought to be enjoined is against Frederick Rabberman, but the bill professes to be by Valentine Rabberman and is signed by him as counsel.

It may be, as insisted by counsel, that this is but a slip of the pen by the draftsman, and that Frederick, and not Valentine, was intended. If so, it was a serious slip; it makes a .party complaining by one name to enjoin a judgment against a party of another Dame. And as the bill is before us, the court below was authorized to hold there was no equity in the bill.

The decree is affirmed.

Deoree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

We see no cause to disturb the decree below.

The judgment sought to be enjoined is against Frederick Rabberman, but the bill professes to be by Valentine Rabberman and is signed by him as counsel.

It may be, as insisted by counsel, that this is but a slip of the pen by the draftsman, and that Frederick, and not Valentine, was intended. If so, it was a serious slip; it makes a .party complaining by one name to enjoin a judgment against a party of another Dame. And as the bill is before us, the court below was authorized to hold there was no equity in the bill.

The decree is affirmed.

Deoree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 Ill. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabberman-v-hause-ill-1878.