Rabb v. Louisiana

235 U.S. 688, 35 S. Ct. 204
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 2, 1914
DocketNo. 33
StatusPublished

This text of 235 U.S. 688 (Rabb v. Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rabb v. Louisiana, 235 U.S. 688, 35 S. Ct. 204 (1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; Adams v. Russell, 229 U. S. 353; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 [689]*689U. S. 536.

No brief filed for the plaintiff in error. Mr. R. G. Pleasant for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian
215 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Adams v. Russell
229 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 U.S. 688, 35 S. Ct. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabb-v-louisiana-scotus-1914.