Rabassa v. Raab

122 A. 309, 95 N.J. Eq. 255, 10 Stock. 255, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 715
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 28, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 A. 309 (Rabassa v. Raab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rabassa v. Raab, 122 A. 309, 95 N.J. Eq. 255, 10 Stock. 255, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 715 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Baekes in the court of chancery.

For affirmance—-The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, "Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanstein v. Kelly
24 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Owens v. Hill
1941 OK 269 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Massari v. Esposito
7 Conn. Super. Ct. 183 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A. 309, 95 N.J. Eq. 255, 10 Stock. 255, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabassa-v-raab-nj-1923.