Rabassa v. Raab
122 A. 309, 95 N.J. Eq. 255, 10 Stock. 255, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 715
Opinion
The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Baekes in the court of chancery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rabassa v. Raab, 122 A. 309, 95 N.J. Eq. 255, 10 Stock. 255, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 715 (N.J. 1923).
122 A. 309 (Rabassa v. Raab) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hanstein v. Kelly
24 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Owens v. Hill
1941 OK 269 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Massari v. Esposito
7 Conn. Super. Ct. 183 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1939)