Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.

Fourth Circuit

Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.

16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7257, 1994 WL 11993

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 1994

Docket93-7155

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 408 (Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., 16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7257, 1994 WL 11993 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rabah Mumammad ALI, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr., Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Rabah Muhammad Ali, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. Freeman, No. CA-93-575-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rabah Mumammad ALI, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr., Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Rabah Muhammad Ali, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. Freeman, No. CA-93-575-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7257, 1994 WL 11993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabah-mumammad-ali-v-franklin-e-freeman-jr-ca4-1994.