Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.

16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7257, 1994 WL 11993
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 1994·No. 93-7155·Published

Opinion

16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rabah Mumammad ALI, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr., Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Rabah Muhammad Ali, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. Freeman, No. CA-93-575-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., 16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7257, 1994 WL 11993 (4th Cir. 1994).

16 F.3d 408 (Rabah Mumammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.