Rabah Muhammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Randall E. Lee Alton Anderson

21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15925, 1994 WL 118377
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1994
Docket94-6081
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 421 (Rabah Muhammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Randall E. Lee Alton Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rabah Muhammad Ali v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Randall E. Lee Alton Anderson, 21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15925, 1994 WL 118377 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rabah Muhammad ALI, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr.; Randall E. Lee; Alton Anderson,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-770)

Rabah Muhammad Ali, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. Freeman, No. CA-93-770 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15925, 1994 WL 118377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rabah-muhammad-ali-v-franklin-e-freeman-jr-randall-ca4-1994.