Raatz v. Sand

North Dakota Supreme Court

Raatz v. Sand

300 N.W. 467, 71 N.D. 320

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 17, 1941·No. File No. 6798·Published

Opinion

Morris, J.

This proceeding involves an application for a supervisory writ. The facts are similar and the questions of law are identical with those involved in David W. Goodman v. Fred Christensen, Ben Koester, and James Kennelly, the Board of County Commissioners and Board of Equalization in and for the county of Kidder, in the state of North Dakota, ante, 306, 300 NW 460. Our determination in this proceeding is therefore controlled by that decision. The writ prayed for is denied.

Burr, Ch. J., and Christianson, Nuessle, and Burke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris, J.

This proceeding involves an application for a supervisory writ. The facts are similar and the questions of law are identical with those involved in David W. Goodman v. Fred Christensen, Ben Koester, and James Kennelly, the Board of County Commissioners and Board of Equalization in and for the county of Kidder, in the state of North Dakota, ante, 306, 300 NW 460. Our determination in this proceeding is therefore controlled by that decision. The writ prayed for is denied.

Burr, Ch. J., and Christianson, Nuessle, and Burke, JJ., concur.

Raatz v. Sand, 300 N.W. 467, 71 N.D. 320 (N.D. 1941).

Pincite

300 N.W. 467 (Raatz v. Sand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related