Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc.

23 Misc. 2d 919, 206 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3666

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Misc. 2d 919 (Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc., 23 Misc. 2d 919, 206 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI