Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc.
23 Misc. 2d 919, 206 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3666
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 4, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.
The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc., 23 Misc. 2d 919, 206 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).
23 Misc. 2d 919 (Raas v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
William H. Beggs and Mary Clark Beggs v. Dougherty Overseas, Inc.
287 F.2d 80 (Second Circuit, 1961)