Raab v. RIVER RIDGE-SALINE, LLC

774 N.W.2d 691, 485 Mich. 969, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2633
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Raab v. RIVER RIDGE-SALINE, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 485 Mich. 1105
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2009·No. 139255·Published

Opinion

774 N.W.2d 691 (2009)

Steven RAAB and Amber Raab, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
RIVER RIDGE-SALINE, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 139255. COA No. 280335.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 20, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Washtenaw Circuit Court violated AO 1998-1 by remanding the case based on its review of documents the plaintiffs submitted with their response to the defendant's motion for summary disposition. See Etefia v. Credit Technologies Inc., 245 Mich. App. 466, 628 N.W.2d 577 (2001). The parties should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raab v. RIVER RIDGE-SALINE, LLC, 774 N.W.2d 691, 485 Mich. 969, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2633 (Mich. 2009).

774 N.W.2d 691 (Raab v. RIVER RIDGE-SALINE, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Etefia v. Credit Technologies, Inc
628 N.W.2d 577 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2001)