R.A. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

R.A. v. Commonwealth

55 A.3d 1048, 618 Pa. 156

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 15, 2012

DocketNo. 102 MAL 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.3d 1048 (R.A. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.A. v. Commonwealth, 55 A.3d 1048, 618 Pa. 156 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

[157]*157 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

1. Whether [the] Commonwealth Court erred by determining that the videotape statement of a subject child is not admissible because the Administrative Law Judge heard testimony describing the statements before viewing the videotape?

2. Whether [the] Commonwealth Court erred by requiring that the videotape statement of a young victim of sexual abuse be corroborated by other evidence?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[157]*157 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

1. Whether [the] Commonwealth Court erred by determining that the videotape statement of a subject child is not admissible because the Administrative Law Judge heard testimony describing the statements before viewing the videotape?

2. Whether [the] Commonwealth Court erred by requiring that the videotape statement of a young victim of sexual abuse be corroborated by other evidence?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.3d 1048, 618 Pa. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ra-v-commonwealth-pa-2012.