Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
TETI AMUN RA-BEY EX RELATIONE : No. 5 EM 2020 [SMITH, CARL], : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF : PRISONS I.E. [PHILADELPHIA : INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONS CENTER] : D/B/A WARDEN MICHELLE FERRELL : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS D/B/A TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : D/B/A ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY : MIKE MCFARLAND, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the “Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum” are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation
is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of
record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons (Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.