Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons
This text of Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons (Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
TETI AMUN RA-BEY EX RELATIONE : No. 5 EM 2020 [SMITH, CARL], : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF : PRISONS I.E. [PHILADELPHIA : INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONS CENTER] : D/B/A WARDEN MICHELLE FERRELL : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS D/B/A TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : D/B/A ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY : MIKE MCFARLAND, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the “Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum” are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation
is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of
record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ra-bey-t-v-phila-dept-of-prisons-pa-2020.