R.A. Alberti v. Com.

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 31, 2018
Docket336 and 468 F.R. 2015
StatusUnpublished

This text of R.A. Alberti v. Com. (R.A. Alberti v. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.A. Alberti v. Com., (Pa. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Richard A. Alberti, : Petitioner : : v. : : Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Nos. 336 and 468 F.R. 2015 Respondent : Submitted: May 7, 2018

BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, Judge HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge HONORABLE CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON, Judge

OPINION NOT REPORTED

MEMORANDUM OPINION BY JUDGE COVEY FILED: May 31, 2018

Richard A. Alberti (Alberti) petitions this Court for review of the Board of Finance and Revenue’s (Board) April 30, 2015 order (May Order)1 affirming the Board of Appeals’ (BOA) dismissal of his Petitions for Reassessment (Reassessment Petitions) as untimely, and the Board’s July 16, 2015 order (July Order)2 affirming the BOA’s refusal to adjust the assessments based on Alberti’s 2005 and 2006 tax year income. The issues before the Court are: (1) whether Alberti’s appeals from his 2002 to 2004, and 2007 to 2011 tax assessments were timely filed;3 and (2) whether Alberti’s 2005 and 2006 income from Pennsylvania lottery winnings was exempt from personal income tax.

Although this Court hears [appeals from Board of Finance and Revenue orders] in its appellate jurisdiction, it functions essentially as a trial court. Therefore, this Court

1 The Board’s April 30, 2015 order was mailed on May 8, 2015. See Alberti Br. Ex. A. 2 The Board’s July 16, 2015 order was mailed on July 21, 2015. See Alberti Br. Ex. B. 3 Although Alberti challenges the Board’s May Order in his brief to this Court, Alberti fails to specifically address the jurisdictional issues created by his late filings. See Alberti Br. at 1-2. must consider a record made by the parties specifically for the Court rather than one certified to the Court from the proceedings below.[4] Furthermore, a party appealing . . . has the burden of proof in a de novo proceeding before this Court.

Armco, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 654 A.2d 1191, 1192-93 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1993) (italics added; citations omitted).

Background Alberti is an attorney and professional gambler. See Alberti Br. at 1, 3; see also Commonwealth Br. at 7. On July 8, 1995, Alberti won the Pennsylvania Super 7 lottery’s (Super 7) $25,876,090.50 jackpot, payable by John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company in 25 annual installments of $995,234.25. See Alberti Br. at 3-4; see also Alberti Br. Ex. C. “In 2009, [Alberti] sold a portion of the [John] Hancock annuity to Settlement Funding LLC for $1,062,720.00. In 2010, [Alberti] sold the remainder of the [John] Hancock annuity to Settlement Funding LLC for $5,451,480.00.” Alberti Br. at 4-5. Section 330(a) of the Tax Reform Code of 1971 (Code),5 72 P.S. § 7330(a), requires every Pennsylvania taxpayer having income for a taxable year to file a Pennsylvania Income Tax Return (PA-40) with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth), Department of Revenue (Department) on or before April 15th of the following year. Alberti did not timely file state income tax returns

4 The facts in Board appeals are typically stipulated by the parties pursuant to Rule 1571(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. On September 6, 2017, Alberti filed a proposed stipulation of facts. On October 6, 2017, the Commonwealth “disagree[d]” with all of Alberti’s proposed facts. Commonwealth Resp. to Proposed Stip. of Facts. Notwithstanding, the parties filed a Joint Application for Submission of Decision on Briefs, which this Court granted on April 18, 2018. Therefore, this Court relied upon the parties’ briefs in reaching its decision. 5 Act of March 4, 1971, P.L. 6, as amended, added by Section 4 of the Act of August 31, 1971. 2 for tax years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011.6 As a result, the Department created returns for those years based upon information it obtained from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). See Alberti Br. at 2. On October 12, 2011, the Department issued Personal Income Tax Assessment Notices (Assessment Notice) to Alberti for tax years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008 and 2009.7 See Commonwealth Br. Ex. A. On July 16, 2012, the Department issued an Assessment Notice for tax year 2010. See Commonwealth Br. Ex. A. On July 14, 2014, the Department issued an Assessment Notice for tax year 2011. See Commonwealth Br. Ex. A. Alberti filed the Reassessment Petitions with the BOA on October 15, 2014 (relative to the 2007 tax year); on October 16, 2014 (for the 2004, 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax years); on November 1, 2014 (relative to the 2011 tax year); and on November 14, 2014 (for the 2002 and 2003 tax years). See Commonwealth Br. Ex. B. The BOA dismissed Alberti’s Reassessment Petitions as untimely. Alberti appealed to the Board. On April 30, 2015, the Board affirmed the BOA’s determination. Alberti appealed from the Board’s May Order to this Court (No. 336 F.R. 2015). Alberti also failed to timely file Commonwealth income tax returns for tax years 2005 and 2006, thereby requiring the Department to create those returns

6 The Department’s Assessment Notices reflect that Alberti’s Commonwealth tax returns were received for the following tax years on the specified date: 2002 on September 27, 2011; 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007 and 2008 on September 29, 2011; 2006 on September 23, 2011; 2009 on September 30, 2011; 2010 on July 3, 2012; and, 2011 on April 1, 2014. Alberti clarified: “The [Department] prepared [tax] returns for [Alberti] for the [tax] years 2002 through 2011, based on information provided by the [IRS]. Since then, [Alberti] has filed [tax] returns for all years in question with both the Commonwealth and the IRS.” Alberti Br. at 2-3. 7 Section 119.14(a) of the Department’s Regulations requires taxes to “be assessed within three years after the return was filed.” 61 Pa. Code § 119.14(a). 3 based on IRS information.8 The Department initially assessed Alberti taxes based on multiple income classes, including gambling and lottery winnings totaling $7,452,359.00 for 2005 and $1,783,834.00 in 2006. See Commonwealth Br. at 7. The Department’s Assessment Notices reflect that Alberti’s 2005 tax return was eventually received on September 29, 2011, and his 2006 tax return was received on September 23, 2011. See Commonwealth Br. Ex. A; see also Alberti Br. at 2-3. Therein, Alberti reported that his 2005 and 2006 gambling income was $0.00. See Alberti Br. Ex. B (July Order) at 2. After review, the Department issued a Notice of Reopened Assessment on September 26, 2014, in which the Department reduced Alberti’s gambling and lottery income to $5,780,071.00 for the 2005 tax year and $819,416.00 for the 2006 tax year, and assessed him taxes in the amounts of $298,360.64 and $44,449.44, respectively. See Commonwealth Br. at 7. Alberti appealed to the BOA. The BOA requested Alberti to supply evidence to support his 2005 and 2006 income adjustments, but Alberti failed to do so. See Alberti Br. Ex. B at 2. Thereafter, the BOA dismissed Alberti’s appeal. Alberti appealed to the Board for an adjustment to his taxable income for both years, and also requested a reduction in his $995,234.00 tax burden because his 1995 Super 7 lottery winnings were exempt from personal income tax at the time he won. See Alberti Br. Ex. B at 2. “[Alberti] acknowledged that he sold his Pennsylvania lottery annuity winnings to a third party for cash.” Commonwealth Br. at 8. On July 16, 2015, the Board affirmed the BOA’s determination, stating that the third-party sale was taxable income since Alberti realized gain from the disposition of property. See Alberti Br. Ex. B at 2. Alberti appealed from the Board’s July Order to this Court (No. 468 F.R. 2015).

8 Alberti acknowledged that the Department initially prepared his 2005 and 2006 tax returns based on IRS information. See Alberti Br. at 2-3. 4 On November 18, 2015, this Court stayed Alberti’s appeal from the Board’s May Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scholastic Services Organization, Inc. v. Commonwealth
721 A.2d 74 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Biro v. Commonwealth
707 A.2d 1205 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
H.D. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
751 A.2d 1216 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Armco, Inc. v. Commonwealth
654 A.2d 1191 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Quest Diagnostics Venture, LLC v. Commonwealth
119 A.3d 406 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of Commonwealth
84 A.2d 495 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
R.A. Alberti v. Com., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ra-alberti-v-com-pacommwct-2018.