R. U. Delaphenha & Co. v. United States
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155). .For the reasons stated in the cited authority, [230]*230the first claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was also stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351). Following the cited authority it was held that an allowance in duties and internal revenue taxes should be made as to the merchandise respecting the quantities reported by the discharging inspectors as not landed, or as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
23 Cust. Ct. 229 (R. U. Delaphenha & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.