R. U. Delaphenha & Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 229, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1157
United States Customs Court·Decided December 14, 1949·No. No. 53820; protests 119192-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155). .For the reasons stated in the cited authority, [230]*230the first claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was also stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351). Following the cited authority it was held that an allowance in duties and internal revenue taxes should be made as to the merchandise respecting the quantities reported by the discharging inspectors as not landed, or as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. U. Delaphenha & Co. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 229, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1157 (cusc 1949).

23 Cust. Ct. 229 (R. U. Delaphenha & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)