R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 437, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1934
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 345 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1954·No. No. 57954; protest 191441-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grenadine the same in all material respects as that the subject of La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 44, C. A. D. 461), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 437, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1934 (cusc 1954).
32 Cust. Ct. 437 (R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.