R-Tex Oil Co. v. Allred

Texas Commission of Appeals

R-Tex Oil Co. v. Allred

70 S.W.2d 587

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 1934

DocketNo. 1519—1757—6640

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.W.2d 587 (R-Tex Oil Co. v. Allred) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R-Tex Oil Co. v. Allred, 70 S.W.2d 587 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

This is a companion case to Rhoads Drilling Company et al. v. James V. Allred, Attor[588]*588ney General, 70 S.W.(2d) 576, this day decided. Relator is the owner of an oil and gas lease covering a certain tract in the bed of the Sabine river, and identical in date and terms, except the description of the area leased, with the' leases involved in that case. Respondent declined to approve a supplemental contract executed by the board of mineral development and relator on July 1, 1033, containing substantially the same recitals, terms, and conditions as those contained in the supplemental contract in that case -construed. The pleadings present similar facts and the briefs the same questions.

The writ of mandamus will issue in accordance with the prayer of relator’s petition, and directing approval of the contract as of July 1, 1933.

Adopted by the Supreme Court April 18, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

This is a companion case to Rhoads Drilling Company et al. v. James V. Allred, Attor[588]*588ney General, 70 S.W.(2d) 576, this day decided. Relator is the owner of an oil and gas lease covering a certain tract in the bed of the Sabine river, and identical in date and terms, except the description of the area leased, with the' leases involved in that case. Respondent declined to approve a supplemental contract executed by the board of mineral development and relator on July 1, 1033, containing substantially the same recitals, terms, and conditions as those contained in the supplemental contract in that case -construed. The pleadings present similar facts and the briefs the same questions.

The writ of mandamus will issue in accordance with the prayer of relator’s petition, and directing approval of the contract as of July 1, 1933.

Adopted by the Supreme Court April 18, 1934.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.W.2d 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-tex-oil-co-v-allred-texcommnapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack