R. Ruthenburg v. Louisville Trust Company
This text of 191 F.2d 860 (R. Ruthenburg v. Louisville Trust Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
191 F.2d 860
R. RUTHENBURG, Suing for Himself and All Other Stockholders
of the Banco-Kentucky Company, Defunct, Appellants,
v.
LOUISVILLE TRUST COMPANY and Chemical Bank & Trust Company, Appellees.
No. 11278.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 19, 1951.
R. Ruthenburg, W. C. Edrington, Lousiville, Ky., for appellant.
Ogden, Galphin & Abell, and Blakey Helm, and Percy Brown, Jr., all of Louisville, Ky., for appellees.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed upon the authority of Reese v. Louisville Trust Co., 6 Cir., 58 F.2d 638, Emmons v. Smitt, 6 Cir., 149 F.2d 869, and Givens v. Moll, 5 Cir., 179 F.2d 765.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 F.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-ruthenburg-v-louisville-trust-company-ca6-1951.