Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/R. R. v. . R. R.

R. R. v. . R. R.

80 S.E. 1118, 164 N.C. 395, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 76
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R. R. v. . R. R.. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 N.C. 425 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 10, 1913·Published

Opinion

This is an action to recover damages, and the facts are fully stated in the former appeal. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed. This action was tried in accordance with the principles laid down in the former appeal, 157 N.C. 369, and upon an examination of the entire record we find no reversible error.

No error.

(396)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. R. v. . R. R., 80 S.E. 1118, 164 N.C. 395, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 76 (N.C. 1913).

80 S.E. 1118 (R. R. v. . R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.