R. R. v. . R. R.
This text of 56 S.E. 480 (R. R. v. . R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing to the Court from the record in this case that there is at present no irreparable injury and no immediate conflict between the plaintiff and the defendant at the crossing mentioned in the pleadings, and that the plaintiff's road is not yet constructed, the judgment refusing the injunction at this time is affirmed, without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to renew the motion in the Superior Court.
Affirmed. *Page 531
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 S.E. 480, 144 N.C. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-r-v-r-r-nc-1907.