R. R. v. . Dortch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

R. R. v. . Dortch

33 S.E. 1014, 124 N.C. 663

DecidedFebruary 5, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 33 S.E. 1014 (R. R. v. . Dortch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R. R. v. . Dortch, 33 S.E. 1014, 124 N.C. 663 (N.C. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

The facts here are the same as in Bryan v. Patrick, ante, 651. The defendant was elected State's proxy by the new board in February, 1899. This action is brought to restrain him from attempting to represent the State in the stockholders' meetings or interfering with the present State's proxy in any manner.

In Bryan v. Patrick we have held that the new board was without authority to act in the premises and could not legally elect the defendants.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts here are the same as in Bryan v. Patrick, ante, 651. The defendant was elected State's proxy by the new board in February, 1899. This action is brought to restrain him from attempting to represent the State in the stockholders' meetings or interfering with the present State's proxy in any manner.

In Bryan v. Patrick we have held that the new board was without authority to act in the premises and could not legally elect the defendants.

REVERSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 S.E. 1014, 124 N.C. 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-r-v-dortch-nc-1899.