R. R. v. . Bailey

55 S.E. 778, 143 N.C. 380
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 18, 1906·Published

Opinion

We think his Honor ruled correctly in dismissing the appeal as premature and properly remanded the cause to the Clerk to be proceeded with under the order appointing commissioners, which had been made by the Clerk in pursuance of the statute, Revisal, sec. 2580. In the case of R. R. v. Newton, 133 N.C. 132, it is decided that an order of the Superior Court in condemnation proceedings, remanding the cause to the Clerk that he may hear the same, is interlocutory and no appeal lies therefrom to the Supreme Court, though a plea in bar was filed by the defendant. That no appeal can be taken at such stage in condemnation proceedings, viz., when the Judge below remands the cause to the Clerk, has been repeatedly adjudged before the (381) case of R. R. v. Newton, Telegraph Co. v. R. R., 83 N.C. 420;R. R. v. R. R., 83 N.C. 499; R. R. v. Warren, 92 N.C. 622.

Appeal Dismissed. *Page 298

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. R. v. . Bailey, 55 S.E. 778, 143 N.C. 380 (N.C. 1906).

55 S.E. 778 (R. R. v. . Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holly Shelter Railroad v. Newton
45 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Norfolk Southern Railroad v. . Warren
92 N.C. 620 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
American Union Telegraph Co. v. Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta Railroad
83 N.C. 420 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)