R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District
Opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
R.Q., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No.: 1:16-CV-01485 NONE JLT CHRIS QUATRO, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE Plaintiff, COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND v. TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 104) TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL
Defendants.
The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own fees and costs1. (Doc. 104) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge to this case and to close this action.
Dated: November 4, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1 The Court notes that the settlement approved by the Court includes payment of the plaintiff’s
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District (R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.