R. P. v. John Picone
This text of R. P. v. John Picone (R. P. v. John Picone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-20-00165-CV
R. P., Appellant
v.
John Picone, Appellee
FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-20-000644, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s brief was originally due on July 1, 2020. On July 28, 2020, this Court
sent a notice to appellant informing her that her brief was overdue and that a failure to file a
satisfactory response by August 7, 2020, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of
prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: October 2, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
R. P. v. John Picone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-p-v-john-picone-texapp-2020.