R. O. De Witt v. W. H. Sorenson

290 F.2d 562, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4322
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 2, 1961·No. 18514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee by his petition for rehearing and brief in support thereof claims here, for the first time, reimbursement for expenses incurred by him in the prosecution of the business of the joint adventure. Such claim is beyond the calls of the pleadings filed by appellee in the District Court and it was not urged nor considered upon submission here. It can not now be considered here, but the District Court has the authority to dispose of this claim upon its presentation there.

The petition for rehearing should be and is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. O. De Witt v. W. H. Sorenson, 290 F.2d 562, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4322 (5th Cir. 1961).

290 F.2d 562 (R. O. De Witt v. W. H. Sorenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bobby Lee Moore v. United States
598 F.2d 439 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)